An aide memoire of items I’ve noted from the boroughs where I work, rest and play.
City of London
- Planning & Transport Ctte on 3 October:
- Has the same papers on the Temple Area Traffic Review and Tudor Street proposals (related issues) presented to other committees last month;
- City’s draft response to the Mayor of London’s Transport Strategy (MTS). The City is generally supportive but there are some interesting details. The City does not support motorcycles in bus lanes, as they can be intimidating to cyclists. The City is concerned about the Mayor’s proposed development levy for Crossrail 2 in case it impacts city developments.
- Paper on dockless cycle hire schemes, and the TfL code of conduct.
- Local Plans (Transport) Ctte meets on 6 October. Main paper is on the proposed revision to the City’s local plan, with appendix C focussing on transport issues. Of note is that many City employers are asking for good cycling infrastructure and adequate, secure cycle parking, and the report asks the committee members to consider related questions.
- Hampstead Heath Ctte on 9 October. Superintendent’s report notes that a consultative ctte should meet in October to discuss cycling on the Heath, whilst the Heath Constabulary continue prosecuting cyclists.
- Streets Ctte on 17 October. Has a paper on TfL’s proposed extension to the North-South CSH in Farringdon Street past Smithfield’s market, and disagreement between TfL and City regarding left-turn access off Farringdon Street for vehicles. City officers recommend accepting TfL’s design.
- Planning & Transport Ctte 24 October: has City’s LIP submission for 2018/19. Various tweaks for active travel, with two new schemes proposed: enhancing the Moorgate environment in time for the Crossrail station opening, and the re-engineering of the St. Paul’s gyratory.
- Cabinet meets on 18 October. There’s a very digestible paper describing Croydon’s changing population and the resulting public health (and other) implications.
Hammersmith & Fulham
- Cabinet on 9 October has a paper on the proposed LIP submission for 2018/19, listing the local transport investments.
- At full council on 18 October, Conservative councillors have submitted a motion asking for the Cycle Superhighway 9 consultation by TfL to be extended until the end of 2017. The consultation is currently scheduled to end on 31 October.
Kensington & Chelsea
- Public Realm Scrutiny Ctte on 9 October:
- Cabinet Member’s report notes that RBKC officials are talking to TfL about traffic modelling for the proposed CS9 cycle superhighway from Brentford to Olympia (none of which, I believe, is in RBKC).
- Item A9 is the draft response to the Mayor of London’s Transport Strategy (MTS). The appendix has the actual response, which gives insight into RBKC thinking. The borough’s officials believe its network of quietway cycle routes, as existing today, mean that 57% of residents are within 400m of a ‘high quality cycle route’. (Note, one of those cycle quietway routes is the shared-use Exhibition Road, where a mini-cab driver knocked down 11 people on Saturday 7 October). Further, the response notes that 20mph zones are not having any impact on reducing road casualties as the Metropolitan Police is not enforcing them. The response claims that engineering measures to reduce speeds would not have helped.
- Leadership Team (Cabinet) on 18 October, includes papers on proposed 2018/19 budgets. An appendix on capital expenditure has line details, setting out £37k for the central London cycling grid in 2017/18, and zero for 2018/19. Now, £37k doesn’t get you much more than some tweaks to existing physical infrastructure, or some outline plans and a consultation, so spades in the ground this FY will be rare. The zero is likely to be a pending figure, awaiting results of the Local Implementation Plan (LIP) submission to TfL for 2018/19. All of the cycling grid work has (like all London boroughs) been funded through TfL’s LIP budgets.
- Kingston has published the results of the consultation into the proposed New Malden to Raynes Park quietway, a joint initiative with Merton Council. There’s summary results on the council website, plus a detailed report. Overall, there’s a 5:1 response in terms of people saying they will use the proposed link at least once per month. The main concern was anti-social behaviour, and in second place were strong arguments about shared-use path for both pedestrians and cyclists. As a result, Kingston say the shared-use path will be “reconsidered” and segregation provided instead. We shall see …
- Transport Ctte on 10 October. Agenda includes committee’s proposed response to the Mayor’s transport strategy, a discussion on future transport (driverless cars, drones etc.), and a set of reports from London Travelwatch. The LTW reports are interesting for what is excluded: there is no reference to the number of Londoners killed or seriously injured on or by public transport, yet there is a long section on the welfare of LTW’s own employees.
- Mayor’s Question Time on 12 October. Several good questions from Caroline Russell, Caroline Pidgeon and Sian Berry regarding cycling. Most will get written rather than oral answers.
- Cycling liaison group on 10 October.
Transport for London
- Programmes Board meets on 13 October. Papers include:
- Oxford Street transformation paper suggests it will be delivered in three phases, linked to the opening of Crossrail. Further consultations in late 2017 on the detailed options;
- Rotherhithe to Canary Wharf link, says both a bridge and a tunnel are being considered. Options to go to consultation, which is pencilled in for November 2017;
- Air quality investments, asking for £202m for transport investments such as cleaner buses.
- Freedom of information requests:
- Minutes of the Healthy Streets Board meetings, and budgets for cycle superhighways, answered 20 Sept.
- Outputs of the Local Implementation Plan funding for 2015/16, answered on 12 Sept. The XLS spreadsheet has lots of data about cycle training, cycle lanes built, junctions improved, electric charging points etc. One statistic that jumped out is that over 40,000 children were trained to Bikeability levels 1 and 2, but only 600 to level 3. In fact, the number of adults trained to level 3 (1900) was 3 times higher.
- In its report to the London Assembly Budget Committee on 18 October, TFL reported that there’s a 151,000 cycle journeys every day in the congestion charge zone, totalling over 460,000km – that’s the highest number ever quoted for a Q1 period since recording started in 2014. Overall cycling numbers were up by over 6% Q1 on Q1 (year on year) with increases seen too in the winter months. Santander cycle hires were up by 9%, helping to spread the fixed operating costs.
- Consultation on changes to Streatham’s St. Leonard’s junction. Ends 29 October.
- Cycle Superhighway 9 consultation ends on 31 October.
- Cycle Superhighway 4 consultation ends on 19 November.
- Consultation on improvements to Tanner Street to link Quietway 14 to the proposed CS4. Ends 19 November.
- Slow progress on Quietways 4 & 5 continues, with the London roadworks database now showing the installation of a toucan (signalised pedestrian & cycle) crossing at Bedford Hill joining the two parts of Tooting Common. This will replace the current pedestrian crossing a few metres further south. Also booked into the database are works to Trewint Street, where the small bridge links Earlsfield to the path along the River Wandle into Merton. These are scheduled from 23 October for three months!
- Planning committee on 18 October has an application from Broomwood Upper School to expand its number from 200 to 250 pupils. Nothing remarkable (for Wandsworth) about a private school expanding its numbers. But what caught my eye was the modal share statistics for how the current 200 or so pupils travel to school: 49% of them make some or all of the journey by car, 44% walk or scooter, and the remainder on public or provided transport. For comparison, Wandsworth Council published statistics earlier this year showing for its state schools that 22% of pupils travel by car and 54% walk and scooter. The traffic congestion generated by parents and pupils travelling to schools in Wandsworth is considerable.
- Planning & City Development Ctte on 28 September, included feedback on its consultation earlier this summer on the Westminster City Plan. Several London cycling groups, led by Westminster Cycling noted the council’s proposed change to “introduce wording to ensure development does not impede traffic flow and vehicle movement”. It seems that this generated “a number of responses”, which is municipal-ese for “crikey, the punters didn’t like that”.
- Cabinet Member for Highways has signed off the council’s walking strategy. There’s lots of good stuff in the strategy, but the Cabinet Member’s sign-off does read like a W1A script “Westminster has successfully encouraged walking as a main mode of transport to enable more people to walk more often.”
- Council has published the consultation report and revised plans for the Bayswater to Edgware Road quietway. Overall, sections of segregated cycle lane have been dropped and replaced with painted lanes, in response to complaints from residents who can’t walk far to get into taxis …
- Health Committee on 20 September (bear with me ..) has a presentation from Westminster’s section of the London Ambulance Service on its performance. There are two slides of interest (i) cites that cycling volumes have risen 54% on the roads where CSHs have been built, and that cycling collisions are down (presumably, this being the number of calls requiring LAS attendance), and (ii) the presence of the CSHs cannot be blamed for issues with LAS attendance times “there are too many variables”. These are useful statements for those responding to CS9 and CS4 consultations, who are dealing with local politicians who are inferring that cycle lanes delay ambulances.
Surrey County Council
(Off my usual patch, but I was looking for something and found instead …)
- Surrey’s reported road casualties for 2016. Copies being added to local committee agendas (such as Waverley).
- There’s an interactive site using Surrey’s STATS19 data, with details on each accident and comparisons with other UK regions.
- Reigate & Banstead cycling plan has data for the area, plus links to other Surrey CC plans.
- And the county council has a really good interactive map of the county’s cycling infrastructure, where you can drill down to individual road features such as toucan crossings and cycling parking. The map also records suggestions for new routes.